So my team is mid-migration from Cypress to Playwright and honestly it’s going better than expected, but I wanted to hear from people who’ve gone the other direction or had a bad experience.

Our main reasons for switching:

  • Multi-tab and multi-origin support (Cypress still struggles here)
  • Better cross-browser coverage out of the box
  • playwright test CLI feels more flexible for our CI setup

We’re a team of 5 QAs in Poland, mostly doing e-commerce testing. The Cypress DX was great for onboarding juniors, I’ll give it that.

What I miss about Cypress:

  • The time-travel debugger is genuinely chef’s kiss
  • Error messages were more beginner-friendly
  • Dashboard service was easy to set up

Playwright’s trace viewer is catching up though. Anyone else gone through this migration? Was it worth it long-term?

  • perangkat_lunakEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    Indonesian developer here 🙋🏼‍♂️ We switched about eight months ago, team based in Indonesia. Zero regrets honestly. The multi-browser support alone paid for the migration effort within two sprints — we caught a Safari-specific bug in checkout that had been live for months without us knowing.

    The learning curve for junior devs was real though. Playwright assumes you know async/await patterns well. We had to do internal workshops before everyone was comfortable.

  • perangkat_lunakEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    Indonesian developer here 🙋🏼‍♂️ We switched about eight months ago, team based in Indonesia. Zero regrets honestly. The multi-browser support alone paid for the migration effort within two sprints — we caught a Safari-specific bug in checkout that had been live for months without us knowing.

    The learning curve for junior devs was real though. Playwright assumes you know async/await patterns well. We had to do internal workshops before everyone was comfortable.

  • cool_developerEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    The time-travel debugger is genuinely chef’s kiss

    Yeah this is the one thing I keep coming back to. Nothing in Playwright matches that experience for visual debugging. The trace viewer is good but it’s not the same flow.

    That said — we’re in South Korea and our pipeline runs on GitHub Actions. Playwright’s Docker image support is significantly cleaner. mcr.microsoft.com/playwright just works, whereas Cypress Docker always felt a bit janky to configure for our monorepo.

  • pakistani_tester1947English
    0·
    2 months ago

    Honest take from someone in QA consulting (based in Germany, work with clients across the EU):

    Neither tool is objectively better. It depends entirely on your team’s JavaScript maturity and what your app actually does.

    • Lots of multi-tab flows, iframes, file downloads? → Playwright
    • Small team, fast onboarding, simple SPA? → Cypress is still totally valid

    The “Playwright won” narrative on social media is a bit overstated imo.